Lascoux Cave Paintings & how it relates to the people

 1a) These cave paintings depicted major aspects of their lives. Their paintings primarily consisted of animals, which were a main source of food for them and it was who those humans shared their habitat with. Some of these animals may have also held religious significance in rituals or prayers, so painting them could have been a way of expressing their religion.

1b) The humans knew themselves and their community but were surrounded by countless species of animals that the humans had no way of communicating with. They shared the land as their home, but there was no significant connection between the animals and humans other than that. The paintings of the animals could have been a way for the humans to feel on the same level as the animals, as the animals now watched over them as they slept and life progressed. 

1c) These cave paintings showed how their social structure worked, as the thousands of paintings across the cave were likely created by nearly every person in the community. This could suggest a more egalitarian social structure, which is supported by our recent assignment which showed that smaller tribes/groups typically were more egalitarian. 

1d) Many painting materials would fade after a short of time or not be easy to work with, so only specific materials could be used. As these people didn’t have access to shipping services or transportation that could provide goods from other regions, they were limited to painting with whatever they could find. Additionally, they needed good lighting to paint, as they were deep in the caves and had no natural lighting. This could mean torches, but in smaller sections of the cave with low ventilation, the smoke created by a fire could prove fatal quickly. While they were not aware of the dangers of breathing carbon dioxide from fires, these people likely recognized the association with them getting sleepy, short of breath, and nauseous, whenever they were in a small room of the cave with a fire. 

1e) These cave paintings could be used for spiritual or religious ceremonies, where the paintings showed some sort of respect for their habitat or a higher power. They could also teach the young about their environment and what food was edible or poisonous, as well as which animals were friendly or dangerous. Instead of taking their children out into the wild, which could be very risky given that they lived amongst plenty of dangerous animals, they could be taught these skills from a young age, then once they’ve matured they could venture outside. The artwork may have also been a form of community bonding, if everyone worked together on the artwork, it could bring them together and everyone would form a connection with the other people in their community.


2) I’d argue that the biggest connection between the Lascaux Cave Art and all the various forms of modern art is how it relates to the lives of the artists. All art is created and shaped by how an artist’s life has played out. Even in a painting that was all black or white, an artist’s upbringing is part of the story of that piece and is partially what inspired them to create the piece. Just as the paintings of animals were reflective of the lives of those who lived in the Lascaux cave, paintings within the past few centuries are about the lives of the artists and what they see, hear, feel, or think about life. Art was and will always be a way of expressing yourself, so it is a timeless way of preserving what life and culture were like in the past. 






3a) Architecture is a very practical form of art, in that it both provides a building for humans and is a form of art. Architecture can blend into the landscape seamlessly and not seem like art, whereas if you saw a painting, you’d likely immediately think of other works of art. The architect has a very important job of creating a design for a building that is useful but also expresses their flair. 

3b) I don’t think that there is a complete culture surrounding architecture, as it is seen globally and isn’t tied to one specific language, country, culture, or group of people. However, it could also be argued that the culture that practices architecture is humans since we don’t see it displayed in any other species of animals. Plenty of animals can paint, sing, or create other forms of art, but no other animal designs homes with specific themes that are shared globally. 

3c) Being that architecture is how we create our homes, workplaces, and shops, it is a very important tool for society. We could make buildings that are rectangles, a single color, and have one giant room, but that is still a form of architecture. Architecture is engrained in all forms of building no matter how simple or complex. I think that for many people, architecture can be used to boost their moods and make their environments prettier. Whenever I see a gorgeous house or building, I will drop whatever I’m doing and admire it, which is always a small part of my day that I can happily reflect on. It could be argued that architecture drives up the prices of homes and makes them less accessible to people in the lower/middle class, but I don’t believe it has a significant effect on the house’s price. Even if you turn the house into a rectangle, most of the cost will still be materials and construction, not the design of said rectangle. Especially nowadays with computers and architecture software, it is becoming a more accessible form of art and has less of an impact on home prices.


Comments

  1. Section 1:

    Re: Message... But why is it important to send this message? Perhaps we need to figure out *who* was the target of their message? Themselves? Future generations of this population? Other human groups? It is easier to figure out what they are saying when you figure out who they are talking to.

    Also, what evidence is there to support a religious function? Not to say that there isn't, but does the information available from the site back this up?

    Re: Animals... "They shared the land as their home, but there was no significant connection between the animals and humans other than that."

    There was actually a very important connection in that many of these animals were sources of food for them. And that is the clue as to how to answer the question in this prompt. The humans are essentially stick figures, where the animals are depicted in detail and color. Could it simply be that they knew what humans looked like already? ;-) It was the animals that they needed to record for future information? No need to get too deep here. Start first with the obvious answers. They are just as important.

    Re: Aspects of culture... "the thousands of paintings across the cave were likely created by nearly every person in the community. "

    But you don't know this! Be careful about making statements you can't back up. This is a science field. Everything has to be supported by evidence.

    And we actually have evidence of just the "opposite" of this claim! The images only depict activities in which men take part, namely hunting. This suggests that the artists were the men in the population, not women. Would images painted by women be the same? Or offer a different perspective?

    "This could suggest a more egalitarian social structure"

    Given the social structure of the !Kung San of Africa, which is possibly the closest extant population we have today that mirrors these early populations, you are probably right, but what in the images gives the impression of "egalitarianism" Again, the images are only of male activities, not female. We would need more information on women in the population to make this statement.

    Re: Difficulties... Very good discussion here.

    Re: Functions... I agree on the teaching function. I would need more information to confirm "social bonding". If women are involved in making pigments or creating the tools for painting, perhaps this is the case. Otherwise this is just the males bonding!

    "These cave paintings could be used for spiritual or religious ceremonies"

    Do we really need to opt for a religious function here? What evidence do we have for that? I know that the original researchers claimed a religious function, but later researchers opposed that jump in logic, which said more about the biases of the researchers than the intent of the paintings.

    Are you familiar with the concept of Occam's Razor? It suggests that if simpler explanations work in understanding the function of a behavior or an event, then there is no need to opt for more complex driving forces. This applies here. Do we need to resort to religion and faith and a supreme being to explain the function of these paintings? Or can they be explained by "simpler" concepts, such as gaining resources, survival, and teaching future generations about these herds? This doesn't rule out a religious explanation, but recognizes this just raises more questions... such as where is the evidence that it IS religious in nature. We can't just assume that.

    Possible functions:
    a. Story-telling
    b. Teaching young hunters
    c. Record-keeping
    d. Recording events

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Google limited the length of my comment, so I will finish it here:
      ______________________________________________________________

      Section 2: Are you discussing *function* here or just describing the reflection of art in a person's life? "Function" describes some benefit received from the activity, a purpose it serves to the people in that population. So what purpose does art serve in both modern and ancient art? Art can communicate information and ideas or record events for future populations. It can generate anger or support or passion. It can inspire others to act or bolster a person's courage. It can teach and inform and make people aware of important issues or concerns. One great example of this is photography, which is used to communicate and inform people of events, positive or negative, and can be used to inspire people to act or warn of impending horrific events. Think a bit more deeply on this. How many of these functions can also be applied to these cave paintings?

      Section 3:

      Image/video... Good.

      Function... Interesting. Form and function. Architecture can also convince people of power (like palaces) or intimidate . It an inspire worship and awe. It can also enhance the beauty of a place ... or it can mar it by shocking the eye and providing contrast. When visiting dignitaries go to another country, the path they are led through on their way to the capitol is often the grandest and the most imposing (architecturally) to put them at a disadvantage.

      Culture... Missing the issue here. Do architects have their own language? Verbiage? Tools? Practices? Schools? Any of these things will represent their "culture".

      Costs/Benefits...Good discussion here

      Delete
  2. Hi, I enjoyed reading your section on architecture. Architecture is something that I enjoy looking at as well especially mid 1900s era. I’ve always had a love for history and being able to see how things were designed in the past is very interesting. Architecture is always changing and I find myself always looking at building when I travel. Los Angeles city has great architecture especially with the older buildings like city hall. It is sort of a puzzle trying to figure out what the architect was designing during construction and that is what I enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you that art is shaped by the artist's surroundings. Their upbringing gives them their ideas and in this case, what was around was nature. The animals I think also served as multiple purposes but I think the most important one is self expression.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi,
    Thank you for your post!I’d argue that the biggest connection between the Lascaux Cave Art and all the various forms of modern art is how it relates to the lives of the artists. All art is created and shaped by how an artist’s life has played out. Even in a painting that was all black or white, an artist’s upbringing is part of the story of that piece and is partially what inspired them to create the piece. Just as the paintings of animals were reflective of the lives of those who lived in the Lascaux cave, paintings within the past few centuries are about the lives of the artists and what they see, hear, feel, or think about life. Art was and will always be a way of expressing yourself, so it is a timeless way of preserving what life and culture were like in the past.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Describing the Nacirema

How do the Zulu & Andean people adapt to their environment?

Verbal vs. nonverbal communication and how it impacts a conversation